Skip to main content

RECENT IELTS ESSAY | 23rd JANUARY

Some think newspapers are the best method for reading the news while others think other media is better.  

Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

( Band 9 | Discuss both sides | 23rd January)


newspaper
Image by Pexels

Sample Answer 1

Newspapers have been a staple source of news for many years, but with the advancement of technology, other media sources such as television, radio, and the internet have emerged as popular options. While some people argue that newspapers are the best method for reading the news, others believe that other media sources are more suitable. This essay will examine both perspectives and offer my own opinion.

Proponents of newspapers argue that they provide in-depth and comprehensive coverage of news, making it easier to understand complex issues. Furthermore, newspapers can be accessed physically, making them available to people who don't have internet access. Additionally, they provide a more focused reading experience, without the distraction of ads or pop-ups.

Those who favor other media sources, such as television, radio, and the internet, contend that they offer a more engaging and immersive news experience. For example, television and the internet offer visual aids, making it easier to understand the news. Furthermore, other media sources provide a more interactive news experience, allowing users to participate in discussions and share their opinions on various topics.

In my opinion, both newspapers and other media sources have their own unique advantages and disadvantages. Newspapers are an excellent source of in-depth and comprehensive news coverage, but they may lack the interactive and immersive experience offered by other media sources. On the other hand, other media sources offer an engaging news experience, but they may not provide the same level of depth as newspapers. Ultimately, the choice of media for reading the news should depend on an individual's personal preferences and needs.

In conclusion, while newspapers have been a traditional source of news for a long time, other media sources have also gained popularity over the years. Supporters of newspapers argue that they offer comprehensive news coverage, while advocates of other media sources contend that they provide an immersive and engaging news experience. In my opinion, both have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of media for reading the news should be based on personal preferences and needs.

 Sample Answer 2

With the advent of technology, there are now many ways to consume news. While some people believe that newspapers are the best method for reading the news, others argue that other media such as TV, radio, or the internet is better. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the argument and provide my own opinion.

Those who believe that newspapers are the best method for reading the news argue that they are a reliable and trustworthy source of information. Newspapers are written by professional journalists who are trained to report the news accurately and objectively. Moreover, newspapers are available in print form, which makes them easy to read and can be carried anywhere. They also provide a more in-depth analysis of news stories, with more background information and context.

On the other hand, those who believe that other media such as TV, radio, or the internet are better for consuming news argue that they provide a more immediate and dynamic experience. With the internet and social media, news is now available 24/7, and consumers can access it instantly. TV and radio provide a more visual and auditory experience, which can be more engaging and entertaining. Moreover, news on these media platforms can be consumed while multitasking, which makes them more convenient.

In my opinion, there is no one "best" method for reading the news. Different media platforms have their advantages and disadvantages, and it ultimately depends on the individual's preference and circumstance. While newspapers are reliable and provide more in-depth analysis, they are less immediate and less convenient than other media. TV, radio, and the internet, on the other hand, provide a more immediate and dynamic experience, but they may lack the depth and analysis that newspapers provide.

In conclusion, the debate over which media is the best for reading the news is subjective and depends on personal preference. While newspapers are reliable and provide more in-depth analysis, other media such as TV, radio, and the internet are more immediate and dynamic. It is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each media platform and choose the one that best suits our needs and circumstances.

FOR MORE RECENT AND ACTUAL ESSAY

CLICK HERE

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RECENT IELTS ESSAY | 10th JANUARY

Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that in many cities around the world there are constant traffic jams. How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from owning cars? ( Band 9 | Double question essay| 10th January) Image by Pexels Sample Answer 1 The past thirty years have witnessed a significant increase in car ownership worldwide, resulting in constant traffic jams in many cities. In my opinion, this statement is accurate since the number of cars on the roads has grown exponentially, leading to traffic congestion, air pollution, and other related problems. To address this issue, governments need to take measures to discourage people from owning cars and encourage the use of public transportation. One of the main reasons for the increase in car ownership is the rise in personal income and standard of living. As people become wealthier, they are more likely to purchase cars for their convenience and...

RECENT IELTS ESSAY | 9th JANUARY

Some countries have legal ages at which people can drink. Other countries believe not have strict laws is a better policy. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. ( Band 9 discussion IELTS essay | 9th January) Image by  pexels Sample Answer 1 The legal age for drinking is a controversial topic worldwide. Some countries enforce strict laws regarding the legal age for drinking, while others believe that having flexible laws is a better policy. In my opinion, having a legal age for drinking can be beneficial, but the severity of the law depends on the country's culture and social norms. One cause of having a legal age for drinking is to reduce the number of drunken driving incidents. Young adults who consume alcohol are more likely to engage in risky activities like driving under the influence. For instance, in the United States, the legal age for drinking is 21, and since the law's implementation, the number of drunken driving accidents has significantly reduced. On t...

RECENT IELTS ESSAY | 12th FEBUARY

Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned.  Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. ( Band 9 |  Discuss both sides | 12th February) Image by Pexels Sample Answer 1 Graffiti is a form of artistic expression that has been the subject of much debate in recent years. While some view it as a way to add color and character to urban areas, others see it as vandalism that defaces public and private property. In this essay, we will explore both sides of the argument and come to a conclusion about whether cities should allow for spaces for graffiti. To begin with, Supporters of graffiti believe that it is a form of artistic expression that should be encouraged and supported. They argue that graffiti can add life to urban areas and serve as a platform for artists to showcase their creativity. Allowing graffiti in designated areas can also help reduce vandalism and illegal graffiti in other parts of the city. Addi...