Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
( Band 9 agree/disagree IELTS essay | 21 January)
 |
| Image by pexels |
Sample Answer 1
There is a debate over whether new science related tocriminal forensics should be used to re-examine old cases. Some argue that thiscould lead to the discovery of new evidence, while others believe that it couldcreate further problems. In my opinion, while the use of new forensic sciencecan be beneficial, it should be done with caution and only in certaincircumstances.
One reason to support the use of new forensic science isthat it can help in the discovery of new evidence. For example, advances in DNAtechnology have enabled investigators to identify suspects based on traceamounts of genetic material left at crime scenes. This has led to theresolution of many cold cases that were previously unsolved. By re-examiningold evidence with new scientific techniques, it is possible to find new leadsor uncover previously overlooked details.
Another reason to support the use of new forensic science isthat it can provide a more accurate assessment of the evidence. For instance,modern methods of fingerprint analysis are more precise and reliable than oldermethods. This means that cases which previously relied on fingerprint evidencecan be re-evaluated using newer techniques, potentially leading to a differentoutcome.
However, it is important to be cautious about the use of newforensic science in old cases. One reason for this is that there is always arisk of contamination or mishandling of evidence. Even if new evidence isdiscovered, it may not be admissible in court if proper procedures were notfollowed. Additionally, the passage of time can make it difficult to assess thereliability of witness testimony or other evidence.
In conclusion, the use of new forensic science to re-examineold cases can be beneficial in some circumstances, but it should be done withcaution. It is important to ensure that proper procedures are followed to avoidthe risk of contamination or mishandling of evidence. Ultimately, any decisionto reopen an old case should be based on a careful evaluation of the availableevidence and a determination of whether there is a strong likelihood of amiscarriage of justice.
Sample Answer 2
With advancements in the field of criminal forensics, thereis a growing debate around the use of new technology to investigate old cases.Some people advocate for re-examining old cases with new forensic techniques,while others believe that it could result in unfair conclusions. In my opinion,although it may be beneficial to use new science related to criminal forensics,it must be done with care and only in certain cases.
One reason why new forensic science should be employed inold cases is that it can provide crucial insights and breakthroughs. With newtools and methods, it is possible to revisit old evidence and uncover new cluesthat may have been missed earlier. For example, analyzing DNA samples withcurrent technology can help identify culprits that were not known earlier.Furthermore, the use of more advanced techniques for ballistics, fingerprintsand other analyses can lead to new and valuable findings that can resolve thecase.
Another reason to support the use of new forensic technologyin older cases is that it can provide a more accurate assessment of theevidence. This is because technological advances in forensics have made itpossible to re-evaluate old evidence with more precision. New techniques, suchas facial recognition or voice recognition software, can allow law enforcementofficials to verify witness testimony with greater accuracy. Additionally,advanced software can analyze a vast amount of data and help find patterns thatmight have been missed earlier.
However, it is important to approach the use of new forensictechnology with caution. One reason for this is that the use of new tools couldpotentially lead to a wrongful conviction. If the evidence is contaminated ormisinterpreted, it could produce flawed outcomes and unfair consequences.Furthermore, new technology is expensive and can only be used sparingly, so itis essential to weigh the cost against the potential benefits.
In conclusion, the use of new forensic technology to examineold cases can have significant advantages, but it must be approached withcaution. The benefits of such technology in resolving older cases must bebalanced against the potential for misinterpretation, contamination, and thecost involved. As such, it is essential to proceed judiciously and with dueconsideration to the risks involved.
Read more recent essays
Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects atuniversity in many countries. Why is this?
What effects does this have on society?
(double question essay | 18 February)
Some children nowadays take sports seriously while othersplay sports in their free time.
Is this a positive or negative development?
(positive or negative development | 16 February)
FOR MORE RECENT AND ACTUAL ESSAY
Comments
Post a Comment