Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
( Band 9 | Discuss both sides | 12th February)
 |
| Image by Pexels |
Sample Answer 1
Graffiti is a form of artistic expression that has been the subject of much debate in recent years. While some view it as a way to add color and character to urban areas, others see it as vandalism that defaces public and private property. In this essay, we will explore both sides of the argument and come to a conclusion about whether cities should allow for spaces for graffiti. To begin with, Supporters of graffiti believe that it is a form of artistic expression that should be encouraged and supported. They argue that graffiti can add life to urban areas and serve as a platform for artists to showcase their creativity. Allowing graffiti in designated areas can also help reduce vandalism and illegal graffiti in other parts of the city. Additionally, supporters of graffiti believe that it is a way to beautify and personalize urban environments and reflect the diversity of the communities that live there. Opponents of graffiti, on the other hand, believe that it is a form of vandalism that defaces public and private property. They argue that graffiti not only damages buildings and structures, but also has a negative impact on the appearance of a city and can lower property values. Furthermore, opponents believe that allowing graffiti in certain areas sends the wrong message to the public, implying that the city condones vandalism and criminal activity. They argue that cities should take steps to prevent graffiti and penalize those who engage in illegal vandalism. In conclusion, while the debate over whether cities should allow spaces for graffiti or ban it continues, finding a balance between supporting artistic expression and protecting public and private property is important. By allowing spaces for graffiti and regulating it, cities can find a solution that benefits both sides. By providing designated areas for graffiti, cities can provide a platform for artists to showcase their work while ensuring that it is done in a controlled and respectful manner. Ultimately, the decision about whether cities should allow spaces for graffiti should be based on a careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks and a commitment to finding a solution that works for everyone.
Sample Answer 2
Graffiti has been a form of expression for centuries, and
while some consider it an art, others view it as a nuisance. There are divided
opinions on whether cities should allow spaces for graffiti or if it should be
banned altogether. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and provide
my own opinion.
On one side, there are those who argue that cities should
allow for spaces designated for graffiti. They believe that graffiti is a form
of art that can enhance the aesthetic appeal of cities. In fact, some cities
such as Melbourne and Berlin have designated specific areas for graffiti
artists to express themselves legally. In these cities, graffiti has become a
tourist attraction, drawing people from all over the world to witness the
unique artworks.
On the other hand, those who advocate for a ban on graffiti
argue that it leads to increased vandalism and creates an unclean image of the
city. Many view graffiti as a form of defacing public property, which is not
only illegal but can be costly to clean up. Graffiti is often associated with
gangs and can be a sign of criminal activity, creating a sense of fear and
insecurity among residents. For these reasons, some people believe that
graffiti should be completely banned in cities.
In my opinion, while graffiti can be viewed as an art form,
it should not be allowed to be created on public property without permission.
Instead, cities should provide designated areas for graffiti where artists can
express themselves legally. This approach allows for the preservation of public
property while still allowing artists to express themselves creatively. It also
encourages a sense of community involvement and can even serve as a tool for
reducing vandalism in areas where graffiti is already a problem.
In conclusion, the debate over whether cities should allow for spaces for graffiti or ban it altogether is a complex one. While graffiti can be viewed as a form of artistic expression, it can also lead to increased vandalism and create an unclean image of the city. However, allowing for designated areas for graffiti can strike a balance between preserving public property and promoting creative expression. Therefore, cities should consider implementing such measures to reduce vandalism and foster a sense of community involvement.
Read more recent essays
Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects at university in many countries. Why is this?
What effects does this have on society?
(double question essay | 18 February)
Some children nowadays take sports seriously while others play sports in their free time.
Is this a positive or negative development?
(positive or negative development | 16 February)
FOR MORE RECENT AND ACTUAL ESSAY
Comments
Post a Comment