IELTS ESSAY | EDUCATION

Some say that university students should be free to choose their subjects. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology. 

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample Answer 1

The question of whether university students should have the freedom to choose their subjects or only be allowed to study courses that are of future benefits like science and technology is a topic of ongoing debate. While some people argue that students should be free to pursue their interests, others believe that students should be guided towards courses that will benefit their future careers. In this essay, we will discuss both views and provide an opinion on the matter.

The supporters of the idea that students should be free to choose their subjects argue that it is essential for students to follow their passion and interests. University is a time for students to explore different fields and discover their strengths and weaknesses. If students are forced to study only science and technology courses, they may not be able to discover their true passions, which could ultimately lead to a lack of motivation and dissatisfaction with their career choices. For example, a student who is passionate about literature and writing may feel frustrated if they are forced to study science courses that do not align with their interests.

On the other hand, those who argue that students should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology believe that it is essential for students to receive an education that will prepare them for the job market. In today's world, where the demand for science and technology professionals is increasing, it is crucial for students to have a strong foundation in these fields. For instance, if a student wants to pursue a career in the technology industry, it is essential for them to have a degree in a relevant field to be competitive in the job market.

A possible solution to this debate could be to offer students the freedom to choose their subjects but with some guidance. Universities can provide career counseling and advice to students to help them understand the job market and choose courses that align with their interests and future goals. This way, students can make informed decisions about their education and career paths, ensuring that they are pursuing a degree that will benefit them in the future.

In conclusion, the debate about whether university students should be free to choose their subjects or only study courses of future benefits like science and technology is ongoing. Both arguments have their merits, but a compromise solution that offers students guidance while still allowing them to pursue their interests may be the best approach. It is essential for universities to help students make informed decisions about their education and career paths, ensuring that they are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in their future careers.

Essay Related Vocabulary:

Debate - a formal discussion on a particular topic, often in a public forum.

Foundation - the basis or groundwork on which something is built or established.

Competitive - involving or determined by competition.

Guidance - advice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.

Career counseling - a process that helps individuals understand themselves and their career options to make informed career decisions.

Sample Answer 2

There are differing opinions on whether university students should be free to choose their own courses of study or whether they should be limited to only studying courses in fields that are likely to provide future benefits, such as science and technology. In my opinion, students should have the freedom to choose their own courses of study. However, this essay will discuss both views and provide examples to support them.

Some people argue that students should only be allowed to study courses that are likely to provide future benefits. This viewpoint is often based on the belief that students should be prepared to enter the workforce and contribute to society. For example, a student who studies computer science may be more likely to find a job after graduation than a student who studies art history. Additionally, some people argue that studying fields such as science and technology can lead to the development of new technologies and innovations that benefit society as a whole.

On the other hand, others argue that students should be free to choose their own courses of study. They believe that students should be able to pursue their passions and interests, regardless of whether or not they are likely to provide future benefits. For example, a student who is passionate about art history may be more likely to excel in that field and make significant contributions to the world of art. Additionally, some people argue that studying a variety of subjects can lead to a more well-rounded education and a greater appreciation for different perspectives and ideas.

In my opinion, students should be free to choose their own courses of study. While it is important to consider the practical benefits of certain fields of study, it is equally important to allow students to pursue their passions and interests. Furthermore, limiting students to only studying fields that are likely to provide future benefits can be short-sighted and may overlook the potential for new and innovative ideas to emerge from unexpected places. Instead, universities should offer a wide variety of courses and provide guidance and support to help students make informed decisions about their courses of study.

In conclusion, while there are differing opinions on whether university students should be free to choose their own courses of study or whether they should be limited to studying fields that are likely to provide future benefits, I believe that students should be free to pursue their passions and interests. By offering a wide variety of courses and providing guidance and support, universities can help students make informed decisions about their courses of study and prepare them to make meaningful contributions to society.

Essay Related Vocabulary:

Workforce - the people who are employed in a particular industry or occupation.

Passion - a strong feeling of enthusiasm or excitement for something.

Art history - the study of visual arts, including painting, sculpture, and architecture, and their history and development over time.

Well-rounded - having a wide range of knowledge or experience.

Short-sighted - not considering the long-term implications or consequences of an action or decision.

Innovative - introducing new ideas, methods, or technologies.

Guidance - advice or support provided to help someone make informed decisions.

Sample Answer 3

It is a matter of debate whether university students should be free to choose their subjects or should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits such as science and technology. While some argue that students should be given the freedom to choose their subjects based on their interests, others believe that they should only study subjects that will benefit their future careers. In my opinion, students should have the freedom to choose their subjects based on their interests and career aspirations, but they should also be aware of the future benefits of their chosen courses.

Firstly, allowing students to choose their own subjects can help them to pursue their interests and passion. For example, a student who is interested in literature may choose to study English literature, while a student who is passionate about mathematics may opt for a degree in Mathematics. This approach can provide students with a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction as they can pursue their passions and interests. Moreover, students are more likely to perform well in subjects that they are interested in, which can lead to better grades and increased motivation to learn.

On the other hand, there are some who argue that students should only study subjects that will benefit their future careers. This viewpoint is based on the assumption that certain subjects such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are more likely to lead to high-paying jobs and career opportunities. However, this approach can be limiting for students who have different career aspirations. For instance, a student who is passionate about art and design may not benefit from studying STEM courses as they may not align with their interests or career goals.

To address these concerns, universities can offer a range of subjects that cater to both the interests and future career goals of students. Universities can provide guidance and counseling to help students make informed decisions about their courses. Additionally, universities can offer interdisciplinary courses that combine STEM subjects with other fields, such as art and design, to provide students with a more holistic approach to learning.

In conclusion, while it is important for students to have the freedom to choose their own subjects based on their interests, they should also be aware of the future benefits of their chosen courses. Universities can play a crucial role in guiding students towards courses that align with their interests and future career goals. Ultimately, students should have the opportunity to pursue their passions and interests while also being equipped with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in their chosen careers.

Essay Related Vocabulary:

Debate - a discussion in which opposing arguments are put forward.

Pursue - to follow or engage in (a course of action or study).

Passion - strong and barely controllable emotion.

Fulfillment - the achievement of something desired, promised, or predicted.

Motivation - the reason or reasons one has for acting or behaving in a particular way.

High-paying jobs - jobs that offer a high salary or income.

Career opportunities - possibilities for advancement or growth in one's career.

Limiting - restricting or confining.

Interdisciplinary - involving two or more academic disciplines.

Holistic - characterized by the comprehension of the parts of something as intimately interconnected and explicable only by reference to the whole.